REGEXVAULTv2.0
Identity & PII/Financial PII
Verified Safe

Credit Card Number with Network Detection Regex for Go

/^(?:(4)[0-9]{12}(?:[0-9]{3,6})?|(5[1-5][0-9]{14}|2(?:2[2-9][1-9]|[3-6][0-9]{2}|7[01][0-9]|720)[0-9]{12})|(3[47][0-9]{13})|(3(?:0[0-5]|[68][0-9])[0-9]{11})|(6(?:011|5[0-9]{2})[0-9]{12,15})|((?:2131|1800|35[0-9]{3})[0-9]{11}))$/

What this pattern does

This page provides a comprehensive, battle-tested regular expression for matching credit card number with network detection, ported and verified for Go. Identity and credential patterns need both correctness and safety, since they're frequent targets for adversarial input. The snippet below is ready to drop into your Go project — whether you're validating in a Gin handler, a gRPC service, or a command-line tool.

Go Implementation

Go
// Credit Card Number with Network Detection
// ReDoS-safe | RegexVault — Identity & PII > Financial PII

package validation

import "regexp"

var creditCardNumberWithNetworkDetectionRe = regexp.MustCompile(`^(?:(4)[0-9]{12}(?:[0-9]{3,6})?|(5[1-5][0-9]{14}|2(?:2[2-9][1-9]|[3-6][0-9]{2}|7[01][0-9]|720)[0-9]{12})|(3[47][0-9]{13})|(3(?:0[0-5]|[68][0-9])[0-9]{11})|(6(?:011|5[0-9]{2})[0-9]{12,15})|((?:2131|1800|35[0-9]{3})[0-9]{11}))$`)

func ValidateCreditCardNumberWithNetworkDetection(s string) bool {
    return creditCardNumberWithNetworkDetectionRe.MatchString(s)
}

// Example
// fmt.Println(ValidateCreditCardNumberWithNetworkDetection("4111111111111111")) // true

Test Cases

Matches (Valid)
Rejects (Invalid)
41111111111111111234567890123456
5500005555555559411111111111
378282246310005411111111111111111111
30569309025904
6011111111111117

When to use this pattern

This pattern is drawn from the Identity & PII > Financial PII category and carries a ReDoS-safe certification. That matters for Go developers because Go's RE2 engine is inherently safe from catastrophic backtracking, but this pattern has been additionally verified for correctness. RegexVault audits patterns against known backtracking attack vectors, ensuring you have the necessary context before using this regex in a high-stakes production environment.

Common Pitfalls

PCI-DSS requires Luhn validation, not just format matching. Storage of card data requires quarterly security assessments and annual PCI-DSS certification. Use a payment gateway (Stripe, Adyen) to avoid handling raw PANs.

Technical Notes

Capture groups: 1=Visa, 2=Mastercard, 3=Amex, 4=Diners Club, 5=Discover, 6=JCB. PCI-DSS: never store CVV, never log PANs, always encrypt stored card data, use tokenization for recurring billing.

Have a pattern that belongs in the vault?

Submit it for review — community-verified patterns get credited to your GitHub handle. Free submissions join the queue. Priority review available for $15.

Submit a Pattern